Please allow it so that if a alliance command member (like say any of the admins) starts the mission and for some odd reason like a miss typed mission requirements or something not seen that make it impossible with the current members around to complete the mission to have any of the admins with a majority vote to complete the mission the coins would then come out of their balance if something like this can’t be implemented due to limitations then I understand
Completion of Large scale alliance missions using coins
-
-
Then what’s the point? You can pay 2 coins to complete a mission anyways. If I am dissecting your idea right, to finish the mission using your voting system by all admins one admin will pay another 10 coins to cancel the mission? I believe the idea is to complex to solve an issue that can be resolved in other ways. You can pay 2 coins and still get the full payout or wait 48 hours. I don’t think something like a voting system would ever be implemented into the game in the first place. Hope you understand the realms of what I am saying.
-
Some what the vote should just allow anyone to use there coins not just the one who started it I should have explained in more detail my bad
-
If i understand you correctly, you want to implement a vote system for the admins to vote whether or not to take an alliance mission down. How would that vote work? Like winwin said, the mission ends in 48 hours anyways, having a voting system is too complicated.
-
Well what if someone goofed up in making it and the requirements are not met then you can’t finish it and only that one person that started it can finish it with coins it, could also just be made that anyone in the Alliance admins could finish it for coins and not just that one person who started it
-
they've made it so alliance admins can cancel large scale missions.
Participate now!
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!